Legislation that would have required babies who survive abortions to receive appropriate medical care from health professionals has been blocked by Senate Democrats.
The measure would have ensured that health care professionals exercise their usual professional skill in caring for the abortion-surviving newborns—just as health professionals would do for any other newborn children.
It would have required, as well, that a born-alive baby, upon receiving proper medical care, then be transported to a hospital (assuming the newborn was delivered in an abortion clinic or other such location).
The measure was proposed as an amendment to the 2021 Budget Resolution in the Senate.
All Senate Republicans voted in favor of protecting the infants—as did Sens. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Bob Casey Jr. (D-PA). But in the vote taken last week, 48 Senate Democrats opposed the measure—which required 60 votes to pass.
The failure of passing the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act “shows just how extreme the majority of Senate Democrats are,” said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life, as Catholic News Service reported.
See these additional comments and reactions as well:
“After surviving the violence of abortion, these newborn babies should be given the chance to survive.” –@CarolTobias1, @nrlc
— March for Life (@March_for_Life) February 8, 2021
Pro-abortion members of Senate once again reject the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act. https://t.co/YNBM7Honpd
In a sane society, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act would pass with all 100 senators supporting. This is barbaric. In 1973 we began killing babies at conception for "choice." Now there is no limit.
— Jewish Life League (@JewsProLife) February 5, 2021
@timkaine How can you justify your vote on the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act? You have no problem letting babies who are born and alive just die without any medical care efforts? What happened to your claim that all life is precious?
— Keith Matthews (@KeithMatthews14) February 6, 2021
"This should be a non-problem."@BishopBarron addresses the Senate's failure to pass @BenSasse's amendment based on the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act:https://t.co/LA5H1iPHlz
— Matthew Becklo (@MatthewBecklo) February 5, 2021
It shouldn’t be controversial to say that if a child survives an attempted abortion—& is living outside his or her mother—that baby deserves to receive care.
— Sen. James Lankford (@SenatorLankford) February 1, 2021
Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE) had reintroduced the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act on Jan. 28, 2021, stating that “every baby deserves a fighting chance, whether she’s born in a state-of-the-art hospital or an abortion clinic in a strip mall.”
He added, “A decent society can’t turn its back on these babies because compassion, truth, and love still matter.”
Related: Crisis Pregnancy Clinic Helps More Clients
Sasse also said, “A week ago, President Biden stood on the Capitol steps and said, ‘With unity we can do great things. Important things. We can right wrongs.’ Well, here’s a chance to do just that.” (You can read the bill and see its co-sponsors here.)
After the roll-call vote was taken—the amendment received a bipartisan majority vote of 52-48 but did not meet the 60-vote threshold to advance—Sasse issued this statement: “Protecting newborns ought to be the easiest thing in the world. This legislation isn’t red vs. blue, it is simply about giving every baby a fighting chance. Every baby deserves care. This isn’t about abortion, it’s about human rights. I am going to continue to fight for these babies because love is stronger than power and we will win.”
Related: ‘Our Freedom Comes from God,’ Says Franklin Graham
Current federal law does not adequately protect a born child who survives an abortion, as the senator’s website points out.
Share your thoughts on this story and other news stories on Christian News Journal’s Facebook page here.
For more news and stories of the day from Christian News Journal, click here.
–By CNJ Staff