Assisted suicide bill passed in California

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on email

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — California lawmakers passed an assisted suicide bill that would allow terminally ill people to obtain prescriptions drugs to end their life.

Approved by the state Senate Sept. 11 and the state Assembly Sept. 9, the End of Life Option Act would allow physicians to prescribe life-ending drugs to terminally ill patients, according to the Los Angeles Times. The measure heads for approval or veto to Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown, who has “expressed concern” about it but not articulated his position, the Times reported.

The California bill is modeled after Oregon’s so-called “death with dignity” law, but with several changes. California’s law would expire after 10 years if not reapproved by the legislature and would require doctors to consult in private with patients desiring to die in an effort to prevent coercion by friends and family members, The New York Times reported.

State senators expressed divergent views during debate, with Democrat Mark Leno saying the bill promoted “individual liberty” and “freedom of choice” and Republican Ted Gaines warning against unintentionally pushing “the old or the weak out of this world,” The New York Times reported.

Enacting the bill as law would make California the fifth state to authorize medical aid in dying along with Oregon, Washington, Montana and Vermont, CNN reported.

Ben Mitchell, provost and Graves professor of moral philosophy at Union University, said that “the legalization of assisted suicide is especially unethical in an age of excellent pain management and compassionate palliative care. The choice is not between needless suffering and suicide but between autonomy run amok and moral medicine. Physicians must not be complicit in killing.”

Mitchell, co-author of “Christian Bioethics: A Guide for Pastors, Health Care Professionals, and Families,” called assisted suicide “a form of medical abandonment.”

“Physical pain can be controlled,” Mitchell said in written comments. “Other types of suffering, however, are caused by the emotional, psychological and even spiritual aspects of the human condition. Patients often report feeling fragmented, unraveled or violated by their experience of suffering. It is very important to know that once it is properly diagnosed, suffering is treatable. We must not treat suffering by killing the sufferer.”

California physicians’ participation in assisted suicide would “harm the practice of medicine” and likely give rise to “another fear” that would “burden the dying,” Mitchell said. He cited British surgeon and House of Lords member Ian McColl as saying, “Many elderly people in the Netherlands [where assisted suicide is legal] are so fearful of euthanasia that they carry cards around with them saying that they do not want it.”

Mitchell concluded, “Once trust is lost in physicians as healers, it will be nearly impossible to restore it. Once a culture of physician-assisted suicide becomes acceptable, a culture of active euthanasia will not be far behind. Witness Belgium, where since 2014, the law permits active euthanasia of children at any age.”

In related news, the British House of Commons voted 330-118 against an assisted suicide bill Sept. 11, according to The Financial Times. During debate, several members of parliament said they had received more letters and emails about assisted suicide than any other issue in years, The Financial Times reported.

— by David Roach | BP

 

Don't Miss Out!

Subscribe to the CNJ newsletter for the latest breaking news, commentary, entertainment,  contests, and more!